Magnetic
Resonance -
Technology
Information
Portal |
Welcome to MRI Technology• |
|
|
| Info Sheets |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Out- side |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | |
Result: Searchterm 'Resolution'
found in 18 messages |
Result Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
More Results: Database (150) News Service (40) Resources (13) |
|
Aaliah Thomas
Mon. 23 May.11, 07:41
[Reply (1 of 3) to: 'LCD Display Monitors' started by: 'robert popilock' on Mon. 23 May.11]
Category:
Safety |
LCD Display Monitors |
Hey! The role of an LCD display is only to draw a picture of the signals emitted from different body tissues. Hence the size of the display doesn’t put any effect as such. But the bigger the display is, the clearer will be the image. So it’s better to go for 32” LCD display with full HD resolution for clear picture. Yes, IEC JTC1 is developing a governance standard aimed at helping organizations govern information security, specifically the standard of deliverables.
Winners never quit and quitters never win -Anon.
|
| View the whole thread | | |
Steven Ford
Thu. 17 Mar.11, 03:16
[Reply (2 of 5) to: 'Building 3d Volumes from MRI DICOM' started by: 'Robert Patten' on Thu. 3 Mar.11]
Category:
General |
Building 3d Volumes from MRI DICOM |
In almost all cases, MRI images have a slice thickness far greater than their in-plane resolution, making multiplanar reconstruction meaningless. Also, most MRI images have a gap between the slices, which also renders multiplanar meaningless and impossible (unless you're happy with black bars where the slice gaps exist).
You can look at your images and the slice thickness is on the graphics. the slice gap is usually not displayed, but if you look at the slice location displayed on adjacent slices, and compare to the slice thickness, you can easily compute the slice gap.
The in-place resolution is (approx) the field of view divided by the acquisition matrix, both of which are also printed on the image somewhere.
By the way, if you have the dicom (.dcm) files, there is lots of data that's 'hidden' that you can access with a full featured dicom file editor.
|
| View the whole thread | | |
George LoGuirato
Thu. 8 Jul.10, 12:29
[Reply (1 of 4) to: 'please help me for find user manual siemens avento' started by: 'reza beigi' on Tue. 6 Jul.10]
Category:
Devices, Scanner, Machines |
please help me for find user manual siemens avento |
If your scanner is under contract with Siemens they can provide one. However, what you probably need is available through context sensitive help. Press the "F1" key at any time and you will get on screen help pertaining to the 'active' area of the screen you have displayed. Example: You are setting up a scan and have the "RESOLUTION" tab displayed. Press "F1" and you'll get help on the "RESOLUTION" settings.
|
| View the whole thread | | |
Michiel Klitsie
Wed. 2 Jun.10, 14:58
[Reply (1 of 2) to: 'Imaging of the sacral plexus' started by: 'Michiel Klitsie' on Wed. 2 Jun.10]
Category:
Applications and Examinations |
Imaging of the sacral plexus |
I mean nerves with a diameter around 2 a 3 mm. But a high resolution is wanted!
|
| View the whole thread | | |
Michiel Klitsie
Wed. 2 Jun.10, 14:53
[Start of: 'Imaging of the sacral plexus' 1 Reply]
Category:
Applications and Examinations |
Imaging of the sacral plexus |
We are students Technical Medicine from Twente University and are researching the imaging of the anatomical variation of the sacral plexus. This means the imaging of nerves in a fatty/muscle enviroment with a diameter below 1 mm.rnrnWe are interested in different MR-sequences that will show these small nerves (at the moment we came up with MP(2)Rage, STIR, normal SE T1 and DW) Does anybody can provide us why we should or shouldn't use one of these sequences. Or maybe somebody does have a better suggestion?rnrnAlso we were planning to combine spinal and abdominal coils (phased-array RF coils), does this depict the sacral plexus in a good way?rnrnWe also thought about using a 7T MRI scanner, because of the high spatial resolution. Is this a possibility or does it give to much artifacts? Or is the spatial resolution in a 3T machine enough for such small nerves?rnrnThanks in advance!
|
| View the whole thread | Reply to this thread (login or register first) | |
| |
| Result Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 | |
|
| |
| Look Ups |
| |
|
MR-TIP.com uses cookies! By browsing MR-TIP.com, you agree to our use of cookies. | | [last update: 2024-02-26 03:41:00] |
|
|